Category Archives: Hurricanes

The Science Is Settled Myth: Part 2 Stop Energy Transition


World Climate Declaration. 

Proving that there isn’t a 97% scientist’s consensus, there are One thousand nine hundred and forty-four scientists, engineers, Noble prize winners and other accredited people that have signed the WORLD CLIMATE DECLARTION and their statement is “There is no climate emergency”. You are not hearing much from these 1944 experts, and you can rightly blame that on the government that provides study money almost only to people who follow the narrative that there is a climate emergency.  And when someone publishes a paper saying that there is no climate emergency, they are ignored by the media who also follow the narrative that there is a climate emergency.

The Declaration scientists on this issue is: “OUR ADVICE TO THE WORLD LEADERS IS THAT SCIENCE SHOULD STRIVE FOR A SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THE CLIMATE SYSTEM, WHILE POLITICS SHOULD FOCUS ON MINIMIZING POTENTIAL CLIMATE DAMAGE BY PRIORITIZING ADAPTATION STRATEGIES BASED ON PROVEN AND AFFORDABLE TECHNOLOGIES. The good news is that we have time to work this out. There is no evidence that we are in danger of a catastrophic event. Rational climate scientists do not see an apocalyptic ending for Earth, by CO2 emissions. 

Extreme Weather

The average citizen has heard that Green House Gases (GHG) are warming the globe.  They probably do not fully understand how GHGs are supposed to work.  But they have been convinced that Extreme Weather, as advertised by the alarmists and the media, is caused by GHGs.  Hurricanes, for one extreme weather, are believed to be increasing.   Is that true?  No, it isn’t true. Cyclones, called hurricanes and typhoons, happen all over the globe.  Typhoons are as strong as any hurricane.  As a personal experience, I got lucky to get a flight out of Tawain a day before a major typhoon that came ashore.

 The following chart is a measure of Accumulated Cyclone Energy (ACE) hurricane and typhoon strength.

Figure: Last 50-years+ of Global and Northern Hemisphere Accumulated Cyclone Energy: 24 month running sums. Note that the year indicated represents the value of ACE through the previous 24-months for the Northern Hemisphere (bottom line/gray boxes) and the entire global (top line/blue boxes). The area in between represents the Southern Hemisphere total AC

.

Source Global Tropical Cyclone Activity
Dr. Ryan N. Mau
e

The high point of ACE occurred in the mid-nineties and has fallen off over the following years 30 years.  This refutes the concept that hurricanes and typhoon’s ACE is a function of rising global temperatures.

Alarmists and the Media

There is no emergency.    Yes, this contradicts what the media is saying, but polls show that almost nobody trusts them. The media takes the word of climate alarmists and then amplifies it. The media seems never to go back and reviews all the alarmists’ predictions that have largely failed. If they did, there is a chance that they might not file those stories. WUWT has a repository of the many predictions the alarmists have made and are shown to be wrong.  Several other looks at their bad predictions can be accessed by clicking here and here.   As people are made aware of these misses, they lose trust in the media.  So much for non-investigating reporters.  May they drive media’s believability lower.

Extreme Weather

So, what is the evidence?  Let’s start with extreme weather again.

The International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is the UN’s scientific body studying the so called “manmade” climate change. While they do not study natural causes, some of their work is useful.   The alarmists make every weather story out to be evidence of impending doom, however, the IPCC says that they do not have any confidence that most of the weather events are caused by climate change.  Roger Pielke,jr posted “What the IPCC Actually Says About Extreme Weather”.  Pielke’s posting has a chart from the IPCC showing what they have confidence in is due to climate change and what they do not have confidence in.  I have picked several of the weather conditions that the IPCC does not have confidence are caused by climate change:

River Flood

Heavy Precipitation

Agriculture Ecology Drought

Severe Windstorms

Tropical Cyclones (aka Hurricanes and Typhoons)

Heavy Snowfall and Ice Storms

Relative Sea Level

Coastal Flooding

That surely takes away most of the media narrative about “severe weather” being caused by man-made climate change.


Evidence that Alarmists are not playing square with the public.

This is perhaps their biggest whopper.

Their long-range predictions are predicated on sharp increases in global temperatures.  Everything is melting, sea levels rising, massive loss of flora and fauna, great numbers of people having to migrate north, etc.  So where do these predictions of high temperatures come from.  Why, they come from a group of programed computers.

See the chart below:

The red line is the average global temperature forecast made by the group of programed computers.

 The squiggly lines are the individual computer output (They are shooting up and ramping down wildly. Hard to take seriously.) 

The green line is actual measured temperatures by satellites.  These satellite temperature measurements have been verified by weather ballons. 

Dr John Christy notes that the programed computer’s temperature trend is +0.50C per decade. That would mean that from 2019 to 2100 the temperature would rise about 4C.  

The satellite temperature trend is +0.15C from 2019 to 2100 about +1.2C.

Who do you want to believe—actual temperature measurements or a pack of programed computers?

The 1944 scientist, etc., weigh in on these computer made predictions:

“To believe the outcome of a climate model is to believe what the model makers have put in. This is precisely the problem of today’s climate discussion to which climate models are central. Climate science has degenerated into a discussion based on beliefs, not on sound self-critical science. Should not we free ourselves from the naive belief in immature climate models”

CO2 Saturation Curve

Another reason to believe we have years of time before a transition is needed, if at all.

For those that believe atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) is driving the global temperature up, you can be consoled that as more CO2 collects in the atmosphere it has a less warming effect. The chart below is somewhat dated but that doesn’t change the concept.  The current saturation of atmospheric CO2 is about 425 parts per million.

Natural Causes Creating temperature Rises

A remarkable paper has been published in The American Journal Of Economics and Sociology and the authors are Andy May and Marcel Crok. It is titled “Carbon Dioxide and Warming Climate are Not a Problem.  The paper covers a number of  issues  I liked the proof of natural cause using ocean cycles.   From that paper comes:

Since general circulation climate models and the modern CO2 and greenhouse gas warming hypothesis were developed in the 1960s and 70s many natural climate oscillations have been discovered. These long-term climatic oscillations and the resulting “climate regime shifts” strongly suggest that natural forces, possibly driven by cyclic changes in the Sun, are causing some of the recent global warming observed since 1920, or even earlier. It is beyond the scope of this paper to detail all the natural ocean oscillations discovered and described in the past few decades, but one of the major, and most important, oscillations is the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO), first named by Richard Kerr in 2000 but formally described by Stephen Gray and colleagues in 2004. The AMO has a very strong climatic signal and has been around since at least 1567AD, so it clearly does not have a human cause.

The authors start with a recognized temperature anomalies chart.  The presumed start of the fossil fuel use age was 1870. The baseline was set at about -0.4 above that temperature. The anomaly is “easy to see” changes in temperature.,. On your standard thermometer, change from 1901 measured temperature to the forecast 2101 temperature. The change would not be noticeable.

The anomaly:

The AMO, which is based on North Atlantic sea-surface temperatures is plotted below. 

A graph showing the number of amo detrended

Description automatically generated

Figure 2. The Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) plotted in its raw form (top) and as a detrended index (bottom plot). The HadCRUT4 global temperature average record has also been detrended and overlain, as a gray dashed line, on the detrended AMO. Data from NOAA

There are several key features displayed in figure 2. First, we observe that the secular trend in the AMO of 0.3°C is about 30% of the warming observed globally in the 20th century. Next, we observe that the warming period from 1980 to 2005 coincides with an upturn in the AMO index. The AMO index has been traced to 1567AD, thus it is a natural oscillation. These observations cast some doubt on the AR6 claim that all 20th century warming is due to human influence and there is no net natural impact.  The second feature we will point out in figure 2 is that the full AMO climate cycle is 60-70 years, and it matches the estimated global temperature changes in the 20th century. To make this comparison easier, the HadCRUT4 record from figure 1 is also detrended and overlain as a gray dashed line in the lower plot of figure 2. What if the so-called human-caused warming from 1976 to the present day was boosted by a natural cycle? It would mean that the IPCC calculation of the impact of human greenhouse gases was too high, just as their calculation of tropical tropospheric warming is too high, something they admit in AR6.

 The Carbon Cycle

I find that many do not know what the carbon cycle is and the place in the cycle that man made emissions are accounted. 

The Wikipedia Chart for the “carbon** cycle” shows “man made” and natural emissions.  In the center, in red, is the fossil fuel etc. man-made emissions, 9 gigatonne of carbon in the year.  The presummed “natural” emissions are illustrated by the white arrows pointing upward, and the total is 210 gigatonne of carbon in the year. The natural carbon in circulation is very much larger than the man-made carbon.  Then 210 gigatonnes  returns to the oceans and plants. However, not all the manmade carbon stays in the atmosphere it is estimated, some returns, 3 gigatonne, to feed new plants and some, 2 gigatonne going in to the oceans. Now the theorized trouble maker remaining in the atmosphere is 4 gigatonnes.  (** Converting the carbon to carbon dioxide is to multiply by 3.3.  The chart was made several years ago. The concept is still good.)

Some may not recognize how much 425 parts per million(ppm) are.  425ppm converted to percent, is 0.0425%. 

The Earth’s atmosphere is nominally—Nitrogen= 78 %, Oxygen =21%,  Argon=1%  and  CO2= 0.0425%.  Not much of that CO2, huh.

Summary

As every year  goes by the alarmists should realize the harm they are doing to science and their profession.  I think the media should recognize the low standing  they have but  perhaps they may be to juvinile to do that.  

The science is not settled.  Their many failed predictions have demonstrates that their “science” is not proven.  Their “science” is made of fear mongering.  Every weather event that they claim to be evidence is not supported by the IPCC and demonstrated data. Be it hurricanes or Arctic Sea ice.  The predicted  global temperatures produced by  a group of computers way over shoots the actual measured temperature.  And they refuse to make corrections..    The World Climate Declaration statement is on the mark. I repeat it:

“OUR ADVICE TO THE WORLD LEADERS IS THAT SCIENCE SHOULD STRIVE FOR A SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THE CLIMATE SYSTEM, WHILE POLITICS SHOULD FOCUS ON MINIMIZING POTENTIAL CLIMATE DAMAGE BY PRIORITIZING ADAPTATION STRATEGIES BASED ON PROVEN AND AFFORDABLE TECHNOLOGIES.”

Part 3 will begin examination of electricity and wind and solar power generation.

cbdakota

Poll Shows Low Awareness of Scientific Facts


Rebloging  a survey  of public opinion regarding climate change commissioned by the Global Warming  Policy Forum.

GWPF Survey: Perceptions of climate impacts at odds with scientific data
A new Savanta ComRes poll commissioned by the Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF) has revealed low levels of public awareness of key trends relating to climate change and international development. 
 
The survey of British adults suggests that the public perceive the impacts of climate change to be more negative than the academic research would suggest. However, there is also a significant minority of the public who say they are ‘not very’ or ‘not at all’ concerned by climate change.
 
In total, 28% of respondents said they were ‘very concerned’ about climate change, 42% said ‘fairly concerned’, 18% were ‘not very concerned’ and 6.4% described themselves as ‘not at all concerned’. 

To see the entire posting click on the following link:

GWPF email (mailchi.mp)

cbdakota

Can Global Warming Be Used To Bring Down Capitalism –Part 3 Failed Predictions of the Apocalypse


The previous two posting show that the real purpose of the leaders is to take down Capitalism using man-made global warming as the cover.  They concluded that global warming probably would not likely be dramatic enough if they just reported their scientific findings.  So, let’s see what a spokesperson of this movement decided would have to be done:

“On one hand, as scientists we are ethically bound to the scientific method, in effect promising to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but—which means that we must include all the doubts, the caveats, the ifs, ands, and buts.”

“On the other hand, we are not just scientists but human beings as well. And like most people we’d like to see the world a better place, which in this context translates into our working to reduce the risk of potentially disastrous climatic change. To do that we need to get some broad-based support, to capture the public’s imagination.”

“That, of course, entails getting loads of media coverage. So, we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have. This ‘double ethical bind’ we frequently find ourselves in cannot be solved by any formula.”

Each of us has to decide what is the right balance between being effective and being honest. I hope that means being both.” Dr. Stephen Schneider, former IPCC Coordinating Lead Author, APS Online, Aug./Sep. 1996

Schneider knows that to be honest will not work.  He is obviously endorsing the scary scenarios.    And it worked.

Along the way, some of the scientists challenged Schneider’s plan.  For example, emeritus professor Daniel Botkin related this story:

Some colleagues who share some of my doubts argue that the only way to get our society to change is to frighten people with the possibility of a catastrophe, and that therefore it is all right and even necessary for scientists to exaggerate. They tell me that my belief in open and honest assessment is naïve.”

” Wolves deceive their prey, don’t they?’ one said to me recently. Therefore, biologically, he said, we are justified in exaggerating to get society to change.”
emeritus professor Daniel Botkin, president of the Center for the Study of the Environment and professor emeritus in the Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology at the University of California, Wall St Journal 17 Oct 2007

 Obviously, they disregarded Botkin’s opinion.   But those scientists have left a body of exaggerated predictions that demonstrate how poorly their technique has been. Yet, however poorly their predictions have been, the media has fulfilled Schneider fondest wish without thinking twice.  For example, they not only do not care how many bad predictions Al Gore has made, and often they find the most alarming part of his prediction and exaggerate it even more.  There is a problem with the reporters.  Do you remember what Ben Rhodes said about the reporters that covered his press releases promoting the then President Obama’s pact with Iran regarding Iran’s plan to make nuclear weapons?: Rhodes braggingly said that he could get them to write anything he wanted because:

 “The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old, and their only reporting experience consists of being around political campaigns. That’s a sea change. They literally know nothing.”

Ok, so what about these predictions?  You are going to have to work a little to see them.  The work will be to click on links to these predictions.  There are many lists of failed prediction available, but alas, if I included them all, this would not be a posting, it might be more like a tome.

Continue reading

Europe Has Been Better Than The US At Predicting Weather For At Least 6 Years.


The National Weather Service (NWS) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) are complaining that the current government shutdown is really endangering US citizens because it has stopped some research.   The organizations posting titled “The government shutdown is putting the US further behind in a weather-forecasting race with Europe” however suggests that the issue is a race with Europe more than saving us from serious problems. 

The shutdown is in its 26th day and it has the potential to make poor predictions about the 2019 tornado and hurricane seasons, alleges NSW and NOAA.  Their predictions were way off for both tornados and hurricanes in 2018.   But one wonders about how much this shutdown has impacted their work.  Being that the 26 days have contained 6 Saturdays and Sundays and more to the point the entire Christmas week as well as the following New Years week.  Probably not much would have been done in that period of time. This sounds like a CYA or a political statement about the stakes in the shutdown.

Speaking of lost time, they tell us that in 2012, the European weather forecast system predicted that Tropical Storm Sandy would make US land fall and our system said it would not.  So this is 6 plus years later and our agencies have not caught up with the European system.  What is some small part of 26 days got to do will the fact the European system has been better than ours for at least 6 years? 

The posting tells us:

“Atmospheric scientists and meteorologists tend to agree about one thing: Europe is better than the US (and arguably the rest of the world) at predicting weather.

The NWS has been falling behind the European Centre for Medium Range- Weather Forecasting for some time.”

 My suggestion is to start using the European system. Looks like that would have saved the US a lot of money by not spending 6 year’s worth of research money and we are still falling behind.    

The complete NWS and NOAA posting can be read by clicking here

 

cbdakota

Computer Predicted Global Temperature Show Man-Made Global Warming To Be A Lie


Frankly, I don’t get it. The actual data is ignored by dedicated warmers.  In the period that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has been the warmer’s authority on all things related to climate science, the forecasted temperatures have greatly exceeded the actual recorded temperatures.  All one must do is look at the following chart:

 

The forecast temperatures, generated by a banks of computers, are well above the measured temperatures.  The satellite and balloon actual measurements confirm one onther, And the carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere is higher than the warmer computer operators expected so the gap between real and computer forecast temperatures should even be greater.  If this gap had only existed for just several years, one might say that we should wait a while because It might possibly start to get smaller. But that is not been the case. As the years go by it has grown larger.  The chart shows the satellite and balloon temperatures  as rising in this chart. That was caused by the El Nino. Those temperatures are now trending down.  Overall, the measured global temperature as shown is rising, but this is  due to natural forces with only a minimal amount due to CO2.     

Temperature is the driver for their forecasts of all the catastrophic thing they imagine will happen.   Melting glaciers, disappearance of the Arctic sea ice, sea level rise of many meters, droughts, floods, tornados, hurricanes, loss of species, massive migrations, diseases moving in a polar direction etc. are all a function of the very high projected global temperatures. 

They keep teasing you by telling you that there is “tipping point” that if reached will result in an uncontrollable ramp-up of temperature that will have catastrophic results.  Can we really believe this as their prediction batting average is not very good? 

I used to be a frequent contributor of “letters to the Editor”.  Most of my letters asked why the media continued to publish these outlandish forecasts that did not come true. That they should review the history of what they have published and that they would see the prediction’s failure rate was very high. Aren’t the media supposed to be skeptics?  Not necessarily about just global warming but everything?  They are not fulfilling their obligation to their subscribers.  And that is reflected, obviously, by the decline of subscribers and their withering loss of credibility which has them now rated near the bottom of the polled lists.

To summarize, if the actual temperature is not skyrocketing, the warmer catastrophes are not going to happen. All their bloviating is just that, blovating.  They must keep you worried so they can continue to get money from you and the government to keep them alive.

 

PS

Some of you may have noticed that my postings have almost been non-existent for many months.  I have had some health setbacks that have kept my posting near zero.  Trigeminal neuralgia is a nasty thing to have. I am on my second bout with it. About 14 years ago, I had my first encounter.  As Trigeminal sometimes does, it went into remission after about a year.  But now it is back. Medication allows me to have mostly pain free days. Having compared notes with my niece who has had Trigeminal longer than I have and much worse, we both find that moving your neck in the ways that one does when typing and reading, really aggravates this damned condition.  I think I am now in condition to continue my blogging- I hope.

cbdakota

Most Revealing Chart Part 2–Failed Warmer Predictions


 

The previous posting shows that the warmer’s forecast “average global temperature” is way off from the actual measurements.  These alarmists use that erroneous forecast as the basis for their pronouncement of future global catastrophes that will come about if we don’t join their quest to remove CO2 emissions and switch to renewable energy.   

The alarmist’s forecasts of catastrophes get maximum coverage in the media.  It is obvious that the media never checks to see if the previous forecast have proven correct. And the following will demonstrate that the media never ever question an alarmist prediction and never ever goes back to check out the previous predictions.

There all kinds of alarmist’s forecasts, some of which I covered in an earlier posting titled” CAGW PREDICTIONS—ZOMBIE AND OTHER”. Almost all of them are embarrassingly wrong.   I encourage you to click on the link and have some good laughs.

The awful forecasts that follow are from scientists, science organizations and many from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)— a UN organization. This assembly of failure was posted by Javier on The Blog WattsUpWithThat with an intro by Andy May.  Andy takes a little liberty with Javier’s posting by adding on a section that highlights obvious predictions that the alarmists should have made.

An outline of the failed predictions are as follows:

·        Warming rate predictions

·        Temperature predictions

·        Winter predictions

·        Snow predictions

·        Precipitation predictions

·        Extreme weather predictions

·        Wildfire predictions

·        Rotation of the Earth predictions

·        Arctic sea predictions

·        Polar bear predictions

·        Glacier predictions

·        Sea level predictions

·        Sinking nation predictions

·        Climate refugee predictions

·        Climate change predictions

–and Andy May’s failure to predict list—

·        Greener planet

·        Increase in forest biomass

·        Carbon sinks increase

·        Slowdown in warming

 

All the above list can be read by clicking on the WattsUpWithThat posting

“Some Failed Climate Prediction”.

 

cbdakota

Most Revealing Chart Part 1 Computer Forecasts versus Actual Temperature Measurements.


The graph below is probably the most revealing of all the graphs used when discussing man-made global warming.  John Christy presented it to a US Congressional hearing in 2017.  The graph’s X axis shows years and the Y axis is global atmospheric temperature  anomalys in  degrees Centigrade.   (“Anomaly” degrees, is the measurement of the change in temperature rather that the actual temperature.  The actual temperature is somewhere  around 15C.  The exact temperature can be contentious.  So the anomaly is usually charted.)

The red line is the “average of 102 IPCC CMIP-5 climate model runs.  The man-made global warming theory doesn’t have one model.   They had 102 models all churning out forecasts of the future global temperature. All with different assumptions of what will the future look like.  All of them show rising temperature based  primarily the  amount of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere.  The forecast spread is all over the place based upon a number of other assumed forces.  Christy averaged the forecasts and that is  source of the red line.

Then Christy added the atmospheric  temperatures that were  MEASURED,  by satellites and weather balloons.

So, stating the obvious, we have actual measured temperatures versus forecast temperatures. One can note that over the time, the separation between actual and forecast has gotten greater and appears that trend will continue

 

 

These forecast high temperatures are what propels the catastrophic man-made global forecasts of sky high sea levels, melting glaciers, mass migrations,  mass extinction of species, terrifying  severe weather, and deadly heat.  The media revels in these forecast disasters and gives them top billing.  But why would you believe this will be the Earth’s future?   Surely if everyone knew this or have just learned it, why would they be persuaded to foist these irrational conclusions upon us?

You may be thinking that only one model would be necessary if they really could forecast average global temperatures.

cbdakota


 

Major Hurricane Landfalls In Florida—1900 To 2017


This posting is a reblog of Dr Roy Spencer’s posting “Inevitable Disaster: Why Hurricanes Can’t Be Blamed On Global Warming“.   It is part a pitch for his new book that is a “putdown”  to those the would-be prophets of global doom. 

cbdakota

=====================================================

September 18th, 2017 by Roy W. Spencer, Ph. D.

Partly in response to the crazy claims of the usual global warming experts (Stevie Wonder, Beyoncé, Jennifer Lawrence, Mark Ruffalo, Bill Nye the Science Guy, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Pope Francis), I decided to write another Kindle e-book. This one is entitled, Inevitable Disaster: Why Hurricanes Can’t Be Blamed On Global Warming.

 

 

 

In it I review the many fascinating examples of major hurricane landfalls in the United States, even going back to colonial times.

For example, two major hurricane strikes endured by the Massachusetts Bay Colony, in 1635 and in 1675, have yet to be rivaled in more modern times. Major hurricane Maria, now approaching a downward trend in both the number and intensity of landfalling major Florida hurricanes:Dominica and Guadeloupe, is probably no match for the Great Hurricane of 1780 in the Caribbean, which had estimated winds of 200 mph and killed 20,000 people.

I also address the reasons why Hurricane Harvey and its flooding cannot be blamed on climate change. Regarding Hurricane Irma which recently terrorized Florida, you might be surprised to learn that it is consistent with a downward trend in both the number and intensity of landfalling major Florida hurricanes:

Continue reading

Harvey Not Caused By Man-made Global Warming


Many of the catastrophic warming brigade are shouting that hurricane Harvey is the fruit of global warming tree.  The media, the other branch of the Democrat Party, are saying the same thing.   Joe D’Aleo’s marvelous website, IceCap, provides a chart that will show open minded people that these big hurricanes have been going on for quite a while.   Well before the supposed start of the CO2 caused global warming.   The following chart shows the history of the biggest hurricanes that have hit the US since 1851:

Note that Katrina and Sandy are not on the list.  Hurricanes can be destructive even if they are not 4 or 5 category storms.  Sandy perhaps not even a category 1 hurricane when it made landfall, caused considerable damage from the storm surge.  Storm surge occurs when a major storm pushes water on  to the shore  at levels well above normal.

Further, how do you account for the fact that the last  hurricane of category 3 or larger to make landfall on the US was 12 years ago.   I guess that means there has been no warming during those 12 years.   But wait,  how can that be because the warmers keep telling me that the “hottest ever years” are now.

cbdakota

REBLOG: 4,300 Days Since Last U.S. Major Hurricane Strike–By Dr. Spencer.


 

Rebloging Dr. Roy Spencer’s posting which can be reached by clicking here.

The season is starting slowly; however,  it may surprise us.   I was in Tampa, Florida on 24 October 2005.  For a day or so, it looked like Tampa might be the landfall.  In the end,  it made landfall south of Tampa, fortunately for my son whose house we were fixing up to sell.

cbdakota

July 31st, 2017 by Roy W. Spencer, Ph. D.

Wednesday of this week will mark 4,300 days since the last major hurricane (Category 3 or stronger, 111-129 mph maximum sustained winds) made landfall in the U.S.

That’s almost 12 years.

The last major hurricane to make landfall in the U.S. was Wilma striking Florida on October 24, 2005, one of several strong hurricanes to hit the U.S. that year. The unusual hurricane activity in 2005 was a central focus of Al Gore’s 2006 movie, An Inconvenient Truth, in which Mr. Gore suggested 2005 was going to be the new normal. As you might recall, Gore went on to receive a Nobel Peace Prize for helping to raise awareness of the severe weather dangers from global warming.

Instead, the bottom dropped out of Atlantic hurricane activity after 2005. The “drought” of landfalling U.S. major hurricanes continues, and as seen in this graphic from WeatherStreet.com, no hurricanes have yet formed anywhere in the Atlantic basin in 2017, despite the forecast for an above-normal hurricane season: