-
Join 135 other subscribers
-
Recent Posts
- The Weakness of the Wind Turbine Operability is Exposed. Stop The Transition to Renewables
- Data Centers and Artificial Intelligence-Stop Energy Transition Part 3
- The Science Is Settled Myth: Part 2 Stop Energy Transition
- WE MUST REVERSE ENERGY TRANSITION, NOT JUST STOP IT.
- Stop Energy Transitioning and Direct The Effort To Erase Enemy Attacks
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- May 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- November 2021
- October 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- March 2019
- January 2019
- August 2018
- March 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- April 2014
- January 2014
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
Categories
Category Archives: EPA
“Area of Special Biological Significance” Stinking Up La Jolla Cove
The pitch by the locals is:
La Jolla Cove is San Diego’s most desirable spot for kayaking, snorkeling and diving. The water is calm and ecologically protected, providing a safe home for colorful garibaldi, yellowtail, rays and even leopard sharks. Because the water is protected, surfboards, boogie boards and other floatation devices are not permitted.”
The “ecologically protected” part has generated a stench that can be smelled a mile away. It seems that cormorants and seagulls use a rocky area by the cove, now fenced off, to move their bowels. The feces keep piling up and are creating a “gross everyday problem for the cove area” according to an editorial by the U-T San Diego paper. The city says they can’t do anything because :”… complex environmental rules stemming for the cove’s designation as a state-protected “Area of Special Biological Significance” are preventing them from cleaning up the place”. Further the city officials say that: “… it could take two years to get various state agencies to OK cleaning procedures.” Cleaning procedures? To clean up poop? Get a grip.
Talk about unintended consequences. I sure that the people of the La Jolla Cove felt really good about themselves as they were showing all of California, if not the world, how caring they are.
If you wish to read more, click: Feathers flying over stench in La Jolla.
cbdakota
Posted in Ecosystems, Environment, EPA, Government Regulations, Health
Tell Congress To Not Renew The Production Tax Credit
Here’s a deal for you. Its called extending the Production Tax Credit (PTC) for one year. For $12.2 billion you can prevent the loss of 37,000 jobs. That translates into a cost of $330,000 per job saved. And you also get expensive, unreliable wind generated electricity as part of the deal. Now who is it that thinks we should take this deal? Let’s see, oh yes, it is the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA). By-the-way, you will have to do this deal again the next year and the one after that and……..
Posted in AGW, Alternative Energy, CO2, Energy Development, EPA, fossil fuels, Green Jobs, Windpower
World And USA CO2 Emissions
Two good posts accounting for the past and recent CO2 emissions (man-made only, no natural CO2 emissions included).
The first posting has charts prepared by Ed Hoskins and appeared on the WUWT website.
This chart shows that China is now the no. 1 source of man-made CO2 emissions. Other charts illustrating change in emissions since 1965 can be seen by clicking here.
Another interesting posting is that the US has, over the past six years, reduced its carbon emissions more than any other nation in the world. This did not happen because of the Kyoto Protocol. It occured due to a combination of factors, e.g., natural gas replacing coal, improved efficiency and lower output resulting from the recession. Remember that the recession has been a common factor for virtually all nations. More about this can be read in a posting by Jack Spencer on the CAPCOM Michigan Capitol Confidential website titled “Shhh, US leads World in Carbon Emissions Reductions” Click here to read more. It has not been a result of the installation of alternative energy sources.
cbdakota
Posted in AGW, cap and trade, CO2, Environment, EPA, fossil fuels
Chemicals Manufacturing Looks For Booming Business–Only Obama Can Put This Good News Down.
The price of natural gas has plummeted and chemical manufacturing firms are going to take advantage of the low cost feedstock. A Forbes posting by Agustino Fontevecchia leads with this:
The $3.5 trillion chemicals industry provides a good vantage point from which to observe the state of the global economy, as many of its products stand at the beginning of the supply chain. From consumers to construction, the chemicals industry is set to boom in the U.S. given the explosion of shale plays and the cheap price of natural gas compared to the rest of the world, according to Anton Ticktin, a partner at chemical industry focused M&A advisory investment bank Valence.
“Chemicals go into everything, they are the part of the first step into the creation of so many different products,” explained Ticktin, “the gives you insight into the state of so many industries and sectors” such as the consumer, through plastic bag volumes for example, and construction, through sales of paints and coatings.
The low priced natural gas will result in many industries improving their balance sheet. Ticktin adds:
And investors can get a cut of the action. Years ago, major chemical companies like Du Pont and Dow Chemical began to move their operations overseas. But today, companies with access to feed stocks that are associated with the production of natural gas, such as propane and ethane, will see a boost in their performance. Major oil and gas companies like Chevron, Exxon Mobil, and Royal Dutch Shell are well positioned to benefit.
Companies in the coatings and paints business will also do well, according to Ticktin. Sherwin-Williams and PPG, for example, are trading near their 52-week highs, while Du Pont and Dow Chemical are on their way back.
The bottom line is that through the lens that is the chemicals industry, Ticktin is seeing the U.S. recovery strengthening vis-à-vis the rest of the world. While GDP is still lagging, the rise in volume and sales seen in the chemical industry should be a good omen for the broader economy.
Team Obama wants to kill fracking. The EPA is moving forward with a study to determine the safety of Fracking. The EPA has chosen not to select, as members of this committee, anyone from industry. To say it another way, if you know anything about fracking and how safe it is and how it can continue to be that way, they DON’T want you. API Executive Vice President Marty Durbin makes the case regarding the Science Advisory Board (SAB) being assembled by the EPA:
It’s a perspective the SAB panel needs as it delves into hydraulic fracturing issues. Unfortunately, EPA has declined such expertise in the past. Durbin:
“From our perspective, critical opportunities to leverage the tremendous knowledge and experience base offered by industry have been repeatedly missed.”
For example, no industry experts were selected for SAB’s hydraulic review panel announced in January 2011. Instead, while members were technical experts in their respective fields, most had virtually no relevant knowledge or understanding of oil and natural gas operations in general and hydraulic fracturing in particular related to their respective areas of expertise. Durbin:
“API, therefore, strongly recommends that the ad hoc Panel members have direct experience working in the modern oil and natural gas industry. … We note that industry representatives have a long record of valuable, unbiased participation in many other SAB Communities and Panels. It is those very individuals, with extensive field experience and first-hand knowledge of the techniques used in drilling and completions, who are critical to the examination of the very specialized processes and the research addressing those processes.”
See more from this posting by clicking here.
cbdakota
Matt Damon’s Anti-US Oil Companies Film Financed by Abu Dhabi
The documentary film “Gasland” had set the tone. The town of Dimock, Pa had been featured in a scene where fire was blasting out of the sink faucets –all because the natural gas companies were using hydraulic fracturing (fracking) of the subsurface shale to release the trapped natural gas. The presumption was that somehow this fracturing was resulting in leakage of natural gas into the subsurface water from which the locals drew their drinking water.
It seemed like a good idea for a movie script, especially when it would bash those thieving rascals that run those evil oil and natural gas companies. So, Matt Damon andJohn Krasinski said they would make the movie and it would be about “American identity . . . and what defines us as a country.” Whatever that means. They planned to title the movie, “Promised Land”. According to the NY Post, the story line was to have Damon, the big oil and natural gas company representative, exposed by an environmentalist. The environmentalist would reveal the Damon’s (oil company’s) plan to “exploit, pollute and leave” the small community.
The wheels began to come off the movie story-line when tests by the State of Pennsylvania and the EPA found that the Dimock water was not contaminated. In addition several other stories were reported further ruining the narrative that Damon, et al had chosen. Again, from the Post:
“There was Wolf Eagle Environmental Engineers in Texas, a group that produced a frightening video of a flaming house water pipe and claimed a gas company had polluted the water. But a judge just found that the tape was an outright fraud — Wolf Eagle connected the house gas pipe to a hose and lit the water. Other “pollution” cases collapsed in Wyoming and Colorado. Even Josh Fox, who with his Oscar-nominated documentary “Gasland” first raised concerns about flammable water, has had to admit he withheld evidence that fracking was not responsible.”
Surely, the Hollywood crowd will come up with something and you want to know why? Because Abu Dhabi, one of the oil rich United Arab Emirates, is providing part the financing for this movie.
Do you suppose that Abu Dhabi has an interest in slowing or stopping fracking altogether? Fracking is propelling the United States to a condition of oil and natural gas self-sufficiency. The consequence will probably be to cause crude oil prices to drop. Because the Emirates’ economic life is predicated on sales of crude oil, this is a logical conclusion.
But Damon is smart enough to make that connection. Yet he is smearing US OIL AND GAS COMPANIES in order to stop fracking. Liberals, seesh.
Click on the link below to read the entire NY Post story:
www.nypost.com/f/print/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/for_his_next_escape_x46uFSONrAaCey67ZzZV0I
To read more of the Foundry Posting on Abu Dhabi financing the Damon picture click here: http://blog.heritage.org/2012/09/28/matt-damons-anti-fracking-movie-financed-by-oil-rich-arab-nation/
cbdakota
President Obama’s Pants-On-Fire Acceptance Speech
The President’s acceptance speech at the Democrat Convention last Thursday was a pants-on-fire moment when it came to his
energy program. (There were other topics besides the energy program in that speech that also rated high on the pants-on-fire meter—but this is an energy blog.)
The President claims responsibility for the decline in the use of imported crude oil. “In the last year alone, we cut oil imports by 1 million barrels a day, more than any administration in recent history”. There are two primary reasons for this decline. First is because the manufacturing sector is still suffering from this less than robust economy—here his claim rings true as he is responsible for this economy. The second is that the States and Private property owners have managed to overcome his and his administration’s efforts to stymie the development of oil and natural gas fields. Yes, oil and gas production are up but not on Federal lands where the President has the “say so”. Oil production declined 11% and natural gas declined 6% on Federal lands from fiscal year (FY) 2010 to FY 2011. At the same time on State and Private Lands’ oil production increased by 14% and natural gas by 12% over that same period.
He said: “…. where we develop a hundred-year supply of natural gas that’s right beneath our feet. If you choose this path, we can cut our oil imports in half by 2020 and support more than 600,000 new jobs in natural gas alone”. While he is claiming credit for the natural gas, it really is No Thanks to Obama who has sent the EPA out to find reasons to rein in (i.e., reasons to stop fracking of shale) this State and Private land activity.
Oil and natural gas production from State and Private Lands will continue to increase and will be the driver of the US economic recovery. Not the “green” jobs that he has been promoting. “We have doubled our use of renewable energy, and thousands of Americans have jobs today building wind turbines and long-lasting batteries”. While Obama wants you think that wind and solar are soon to replace fossil fuels (oil, natural gas and coal) that is not happening. Fossil fuels supplied 78% and nukes another 11% of the US energy needs in 2010. Wind supplied about 2% and solar was barely above 0 %. That they are that much is a testimonial to the crony capitalism being practiced by the Federal government by subsidizing the capital cost of renewables installation. This practice leaves the rate payers holding the bag for the high cost of the electricity that renewables create. It looks like the US will be joining most of the rest of the world that have become disillusioned with wind and solar when Congress doesn’t renew the subsidies next year. Adding to their dismal performance is the fact that for every new Kw of wind and solar power, a corresponding amount of fossil fuel supplied energy must be built because wind and solar are too unreliable (the wind blows sometimes and not at others and we know the sun is not always shining) for the nation’s power grid to rely upon. So not only are these unreliable renewables not competitively priced, the global warmers don’t get a reduction in CO2 emissions.
“After 30 years of inaction, we raised fuel standards so that by the middle of the next decade, cars and trucks will go twice as far on a gallon of gas”. Despite the implication that he has accomplished something, this new standard is in effective 2025 and there are many reasons to question if it can be met. This will only be realized if significant numbers of electric vehicles replace gasoline based vehicles. And how is that program going? The hybrid Chevy Volt, the leading US manufactured vehicle, has sold through August about 13,170 making it unlikely they will meet the 2012 forecast of 45,000. The Volt is brought to you by Government General Motors (GM). Through August, the best-selling all-electric car, the Nissan Leaf, had sold 4,228 vehicles versus the 2012 forecast of 20,000. The electric vehicles are neither affordable nor efficient for the overwhelming majority of consumers who commute for work. The Volt’s selling price is about $45,000 before the Government tax incentive of $7,500. Even at that price, a recent report says: “Nearly two years after the introduction of the path-breaking plug-in hybrid, GM is still losing as much as $49,000 on each Volt it builds, according to estimates provided to Reuters by industry analysts and manufacturing experts.” A little perspective, the projected US 2012 sales of vehicles is about 14 million. There are something like 250 million registered vehicles in the US. Even if the Volt were to sell 45,ooo it is drop-in-the-bucket.
He says that man-made global warming is “not a hoax“. He is wrong. His EPA is writing regulations that will imposed a “cap and trade” program on the use of fossil fuels. Cap and Trade failed attempts at passage in Congress. Here he is usurping the legislative role of Congress.
The President’s energy program is a threat to all of us, and especially our children who are going to have to pay higher energy cost while having to cope with the massive debt this Administration has racked up.
cbdakota
Gasoline Price and Vehicle Fuel Economy Correlate
The WardsAuto Fuel Economy Index compares the cost of gasoline opposite the average fuel-economy (miles per gallon—mpg) of new vehicles sold each month. The new vehicle fuel economy peaked in March at 24.1mpg. It fell to 23.6 mpg in June, the last data point available. This drop corresponds to the drop in gasoline prices over the past three months. The chart shown below shows a strong correlation of fuel price and t the fuel economy the car buyers are settling for.
Wards cautions to not assume that the car buyer’s are fickle but it is hard not to draw that conclusion. Wards cites fleet purchases of Toyota vehicles in March as Toyota was trying to catch up on the losses they encountered in 2011 when the tsunami shutdown a lot of Japanese industry.
Wards notes that the vehicles fuel economy by region looked this way in June: Overall, Asian auto makers combined for a 26 mpg (9.0 L/100 km) rating, followed by the European brands’ 22.8 mpg (10.3 L/100 km) and the Detroit Three’s 21.2 mpg (11.1 L/100 km).
The Detroit Big Three do move a lot of pickup trucks so that may explain the differences in fuel economy.
To read more click here.
cbdakota
Volt And Leaf July Sales And How Hybrids Are Outselling EVs
Nissan Leaf July sales fell to 395 from 535 in the previous month. The Volt sales were up slightly in July at 1849 against the 1760 in the previous month. According to Edmunds.com, plug-in hybrids are outselling EVs by 3 to 1. The public’s choice of hybrids has not gone unnoticed by the automobile manufacturers. From thedailygreen.com the following are the 2012 offerings of hybrids:
2012 HYBRIDS BY MANUFACTURER-PRICE AND ECONOMY
| MODEL | PRICE $ | CITY ECONO MPG | HIGHWAY ECONO MPG |
| Toyota Prius | 23,520 | 51 | 48 |
| Toyota Prius V | 27,160 | 42 | 38 |
| Chevy Volt | 40,280 | 95 | 90 |
| Ford Fusion Hybrid | 28,600 | 41 | 36 |
| Hyundai Sonata Hybrid | 25,795 | 35 | 40 |
| Infiniti M35h | 50,000-55,000 | 27 | 32 |
| Toyota Camry Hybrid | 27,050 | 31 | 35 |
| Honda Civic Hybrid | 24,050 | 44 | 44 |
| Honda Insight | 19,000 | 40 | 43 |
| Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrid | 51,665 | 20 | 23 |
| Volkswagen Touareg Supercharged Hybrid | 61,110 | 20 | 24 |
| Toyota Highlander Hybrid | 38,140 | 28 | 28 |
| Ford Escape Hybrid | 32,320 | 34 | 31 |
| Porsche Cayenne Hybrid | 67,700 | 20 | 24 |
| Porsche Panamera S Hybrid | 95,000 | 18 | 27 |
| Lexus CT 200h | 29,120 | 43 | 40 |
| Lexus GS 450h | 58,950 | 22 | 25 |
| Lexus HS 250h | 36,330 | 35 | 34 |
| Mercedes-Benz S400 Hybrid | 91,000 | 19 | 26 |
| Mercedes-Benz ML450 Hybrid | 55,790 | 16 | 20 |
| Lincoln MKZ Hybrid | 34,645 | 41 | 36 |
| BMW ActiveHybrid7 | 97,000-101,000 | 17 | 24 |
About this chart, things change. Prices and EPA miles per gallon (MPG) may be different, as time has passed since the chart data was assembled.
To find out how well these vehicles are selling, would require more time than I want to put in. A reasonable guess is that not a big volume for most of them. But on the upside, Edmunds reports that Toyota is on track to sell 200,000 Prius sub-brand cars in the US this year. That is impressive.
cbdakota
Corn Should Not Be Used To Make Automobile Fuel
US farms that grow corn are mainly located in the Midwest. The Midwest is experiencing a drought that the head agriculture meteorologist with MDA EarthSat say is the worst since 1988. The MDA EarthSat group is estimating a corn yield of about 118 bushels per acre this year. In a good year, the corn yield is about 150 to 160 bushels per acre which suggests that this year’s yield will be about 75% of normal. Shortages always have a way of driving the price of a commodity upward. However making the likelihood of even higher prices for corn is the fact that the ethanol mixed with gasoline is essentially produced from corn.
It is estimated that about 40% of the corn produced last year was used to make ethanol fuel. The refiners are required to use ethanol and most filling stations have a 10%ethanol/90% gasoline blend. Last year 14.2 billion gallons of ethanol were blended with gasoline. By law, in 2012, 15.2 billion gallons of ethanol must be used. Of that total, 13.2 must be from corn ethanol. The remainder must be not corn based. In order to get a better understanding of what is going on, a brief review of the Renewable Fuel Standard will probably be helpful.
In 2005, Congress enacted the Energy Policy Act of 2005. It mandated minimum ethanol use. However, two years later the Energy Independence and Security Act superseded and expanded the Energy Policy Act of 05 and set new, larger use requirements as well as added requirements for cellulosic based ethanol. Cellulosic means from corncobs, wood chips, straw, grass, etc.—by and large almost anything but from the corn kernel (corn starch). These two acts combined are often referred to as Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS2). Further RFS2 set a maximum use level for cornstarch-based ethanol at 15.0 billion gallons. The Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) is responsible for establishing and implementing regulations to ensure that the nation’s transportation fuel supply contains the mandated biofuels volumes.
RENEWABLE FUEL STANDARD 2—BILLIONS OF GALLONS
| YEAR | TOTAL RENEWABLESFUELS | CORN ETHANOL | CELLULOSIC ETHANOL | BIO AND OTHER FUELS |
| 2011 | 13.95 | 12.6 | 0.0066 | 1.1 |
| 2012 | 15.20 | 13.2 | 0.0085 | 1.5 |
| 2015 | 20.50 | 15.0 | 3.00 | TBD |
| 2020 | 30.00 | 15.0 | 10.5 | TBD |
| 2022 | 36.00 | 15.0 |
16.00 |
TBD |
If you are wondering if the EPA will enforce the law designating mandated minimum use, the following story will be instructive: The 2011 requirement for minimum usage of cellulosic ethanol is 6.6 million gallons.—(See chart above and note 0.0066.) No one is making cellulosic ethanol so there is none available for use. None-the-less, the companies that supply motor fuels are being fined $6 million because they failed to mix cellulosic ethanol into their motor fuels. Go figure.
Corn is a major source of food for humans and it is also it is a major source of animal feed. The price of beef, pork and chicken for example are directly affected by the increase in livestock feed prices. Much has been written about the negative impact of soaring corn prices on the well being of people all over the world.
As noted earlier, ethanol is mandated to be used in gasoline. It is said that the some of the corn used for making ethanol is somewhat different from the corn that normally goes into the food chain. But that corn will also suffer a loss due to the drought making it necessary for the ethanol manufacturers to buy more food corn to supply ethanol to the gasoline suppliers. Thus the fuel chain will be bidding against the food chain for the limited supply of corn.
The commodities markets are showing this now. According to reliable sources, corn that was going for $2.00 a bushel in 2005 when this legislation was enacted now sells for over $8 per bushel. Because ethanol is mandated, the cost of ethanol for blending has little meaning to a gasoline producer as all gasoline producers must use it regardless of cost. The cost of the ethanol will be passed on to the motorists.
Actually, ethanol is not viable economically but only used because of the mandate. It will never be in sufficient supply to be a replacement for gasoline. According to a study reported by Wikipedia, if you are concerned about greenhouse gases, ethanol’s use is a negative: “A team led by Searchinger from Princeton University concluded that once direct and indirect effect of land use changes are considered, both corn and cellulosic ethanol increased carbon emissions as compared to gasoline by 93 and 50 percent respectively.”
The driving force for the use of corn to make ethanol is the votes that politicians get from their farming constituents. The other reasons weigh against using an important food source to make an automobile fuel.
cbdakota
Massive Canadian Shale-gas Field Discovered
In a remote corner of northeastern British Columbia, a massive shale-gas field has been discovered by the Apache Corp. The field is estimated to have 48 trillion cubic feet of recoverable natural gas. According to Reuters:
The company has drilled three wells into its holdings in the Liard Basin in British Columbia, just south of where the province’s northern border meets the borders of the Yukon and Northwest Territories. Only one of the three wells drilled in the region was treated with the multiple-stage hydraulic fracturing process that has been key to unlocking North America’ prolific shale-gas reserves. That well, which was “fracked” six times, delivered 21.3 million cubic feet of gas per day over its first thirty days of production, which Apache said was the most prolific shale-gas test well ever drilled.
This announcement of the shale-gas find was part of a presentation made by Apache Corp’s John Bedingfield, VP for Worldwide Exploration. At that presentation he also discussed other activities as follows:
Along with its Liard field, the company said its 580,000 acres of land in the Mississipian Lime field in Kansas and Nebraska could contain as much as 2 billion barrels of oil while its holding in Montana’s Williston Basin may hold another 1 billion barrels. As well, it’s targeting as much as 1.3 billion barrels of oil in Alaska’s Cook Inlet and 1.4 billion barrels from its holding off the shore of Kenya. It will drill in both regions later this year. Apache said its holdings in western Oklahoma and the Texas panhandle could also hold another 5.4 billion barrels of oil equivalent while the Permian Basin in west Texas and New Mexico hold 3.4 billion barrels of oil equivalent.
As the supply of natural gas and oil increases, the prices are sure to drop. The price of natural gas in the US has already taken a header as major discoveries have been made in recent years. Fuel for the production of electricity is tending away from coal to natural gas. This move is more than just low natural gas prices as it is also being force by new EPA regulations (which may be reversed if Mitt Romney wins the upcoming election.).
Crude oil is more readily transportable from wellhead to the user giving it a wider world market. But fracking discoveries in other parts of the world may bring supplies that exceed demand and thus lowering of crude oil prices as well. Then the floor price will probably be set by the cost to produce and make a profit when getting oil by fracking.
cbdakota

