“Both days (Fig 21 and 22) we see clear evidence that cloud has a very significantly influence upon all six radiations, even DWIR, being measured. Hence, there can be no debate that cloud causes DWIR radiation.”
Anyone with half-way normal vision can see that the measured value of the DWIR radiation minimally fluctuates during either day. Hence, there is no evidence in these figures that cloud causes DWIR radiation even if there are many other figures which show that it does.
But now these measurements, which contradict that cloud does influence DWIR radiation, needs to be explained by looking for other evidence as Holmes would.
Hi cb,
I must acknowledge a serious blunder.
“Both days (Fig 21 and 22) we see clear evidence that cloud has a very significantly influence upon all six radiations, even DWIR, being measured. Hence, there can be no debate that cloud causes DWIR radiation.”
Anyone with half-way normal vision can see that the measured value of the DWIR radiation minimally fluctuates during either day. Hence, there is no evidence in these figures that cloud causes DWIR radiation even if there are many other figures which show that it does.
But now these measurements, which contradict that cloud does influence DWIR radiation, needs to be explained by looking for other evidence as Holmes would.
Have a good day, Jerry