-
Join 135 other subscribers
-
Recent Posts
- The Weakness of the Wind Turbine Operability is Exposed. Stop The Transition to Renewables
- Data Centers and Artificial Intelligence-Stop Energy Transition Part 3
- The Science Is Settled Myth: Part 2 Stop Energy Transition
- WE MUST REVERSE ENERGY TRANSITION, NOT JUST STOP IT.
- Stop Energy Transitioning and Direct The Effort To Erase Enemy Attacks
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- May 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- November 2021
- October 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- March 2019
- January 2019
- August 2018
- March 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- April 2014
- January 2014
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
Categories
Category Archives: US Auto Manufacturers
CONGRATULATIONS!! Some Rich Californian Thanks You For Helping Pay For His New Tesla
Now the Tesla is a sweet looking car with some impressive stats. Perhaps not as good as advertised, see this posting, but still right up there with the best.
And while you may not be able to afford one—early models went for over $109,000 and the new S model goes for about $70,000—some people, wealthy ones anyway, are buying them. Tesla sold an estimated 9,650 S models by the end of April this year. Things are going so well that Tesla made a profit in the first quarter.
Electric Vehicle March Sales Update And Other News
The Nissan Leaf had it biggest ever sales month in March when it moved 2,236 cars. The increase was attributed in part to a reduced sales price. It sells for $28,800. The Chevy Volt sales were down 35 % compared to February. Total March sales were 1,478. The Detroit News reports that the Tesla Model S was the best EV seller for the first quarter:
“ The high-end Model S, which after a Monday announcement will start at about $62,400 after federal tax credits, registered 4,750 deliveries, topping the second-place Volt, which had 4,244 sales through March. Nissan sold 3,539 Leaf vehicles during the first three months of the year and Toyota Motor Corp. had sold 2,353 of its Prius plug-ins.”
Tesla has decided to quit selling the short range S model that is equipped with the 40kWh battery that is said to have a range of 160 miles. Only 4% want it over the S Model equipped with the 60 kWh battery that is said to have a range of 230 miles. The 85 kWh battery model is said to have a range of up to 300 miles on a single charge.
The Detroit News cites a Japanese survey that finds that about 1/3 of the current owners of EVs wont buy another. The reasons:
A new report from researcher McKinsey and Co. found that about one in three electric-vehicle buyers felt “seduced” by the prospects of low energy costs, attractive subsidies and good test-drives, but became less enthusiastic about electric vehicles when faced with issues like higher electric bills and lack of charging stations
Renault’s new all-electric car, Zoe, has an advertised range of 130 but Motortrades Insight says:
“British drivers are not expected to warm to the new Renault Zoe, an all-electric city car, after Renault today revealed it can only achieve 60 miles in cold weather and 90 miles in normal conditions.”
Apparently if you buy the Zoe, you rent the battery. Motortrades Insight adds:
“Drivers will also have to pay between £70 and £93 every month to ‘hire’ the car’s expensively-manufactured batteries, with Renault replacing them when they become worn out.”
Probably everyone by now has heard that Fisker has laid off all its US workers and will soon file for Bankruptcy. Autobloggreen says:
“Kirkland & Ellis is advising the California-based maker of the extended-range plug-in Karma for a potential bankruptcy filing, which hasn’t produced a car in about eight months and is losing interest from two prospective China-based buyers. Fisker declined to comment to Reuters.
cbdakota
Consumers Paying for New Ethanol Surcharge
A recent Climate Change Sanity post discussed the gasoline cost “spread”. The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) adds another item to the spread. The WSJ points out that this year the EPA’s requires more ethanol to be mixed with gasoline than the refiners can use and still not have greater than 10% ethanol in the final fuel. The refiners fear that more than 10% has the potential to damage engines.
From the WSJ posting:
“This year refiners and importers are required to blend 13.8 billion gallons of ethanol into the nation’s gasoline, rising to 14.4 billion next year. The EPA allocates a share of this mandate to oil and gas companies, and to monitor compliance each gallon of ethanol is assigned a 38 digit Renewable Identification Number, or RIN.”
Now isn’t this a great example of over regulation. Each gallon is identified by a 38 digit number!!! 13.8 billion gallons, all with their own name (or number).
February Volt And Leaf Sales Update
February sales of the Volt and the Leaf were slightly higher than in January. January Volt sales were 1140 and February sales were 1629 while Leaf’s numbers were January 650 and February 653. The recent rise in gas prices will probably result in an increase sales in the next several months.
cbdakota
More Range Anxiety From Tesla. Trip On Newly “Electrified” I 95 Falls Short Of Plan
Tesla planned, for NY Times writer John Broder, a trip using their model S top of the line all-electric car. The plan was to test out Tesla’s newly “electrified I 95 corridor” that has two charging stations along the way. The idea here is that these two station should allow for a trip from Washington DC to the Boston area. Things did not work out.
The model S is a $101,000 vehicle with a 85 Kilowatt-hour battery that Tesla reports has a range of 300 miles between charges. The EPA rates the range at 265 miles. The distance from Broder’s home to the first charging station in Newark, DE was about 114 miles and the distance to the second charging station in Milford, CN is about 200 miles. So the trip should be easy. Below is a NYTimes graphic of the trip. The numbers represent the each new phase of the journey.
Slow January Sales For EVs And Hybrids And Obama Backs Off 1Million EV Forecast.
According to Detroit News, “ Electric vehicles and plug-in electric hybrids are off to a tough start in January after a disappointing 2012”.
The Volt had sales of 1,140 units in January, a drop from the December sales of 2,633.
GM says it was due to low inventories in California caused by a rush to buy the Volt in December because of tax incentives—-$7,500 in Federal Tax Credit as well as some State incentives——which owners claim on the following year’s taxes. Not only that but last year, in order to pick up slow sales, GM offered a discount of $10,000 on Volt leases.
Nissan Leaf January sales were only 650. The Leaf sales were 1,489 in December probably buoyed up at the end of the year by tax credits. The Nissan Smyrna, Tennessee Leaf manufacturing plant came on-line in January making the new 2013 model. The 2013 model’s price has been lowered to $28,800, about 18% lower than last years model.
Why Continue To Provide Subsidies For Electric Cars?
The Spark is Chevy’s new entry into the electric vehicle race. Unlike the Spark’s big brother, the Chevy Volt, the Spark is all electric. (The Volt it is a hibrid as it has a backup internal combustion engine.) Chevy has not specified a range with a full battery charge or a price. But the Associated Press (AP) reports that the range will probably be like the Ford Focus—76 miles on a charge–and at a price less than $25,000 when the Fed’s $7,500 is deducted.
What is wrong with this picture? The gasoline powered Spark sells for $12,245 without any Federal subsidy. So the production cost with profit (maybe) for the electric Spark is in the range of $32,000. The gasoline powered Spark goes out of the showroom at roughly $20,000 less. And even with the Fed Subsidy thrown in for the electric version, the gasoline version cost half as much.
According to the Denver Post: “Since 2008, taxpayers have spent or provided loan guarantees of $6.5 billion for electric vehicles. That includes $2.4 billion for battery and electric drive component manufacturing, $3.1 billion in loan guarantees for electric vehicle projects, and $1 billion in tax credits for the vehicles.”
The Detroit News reports that GM plans to build 500,000 electric vehicles by 2017. Assuming they do this and sell that many cars, you and I–the taxpayers are on the hook for $7,500X500,000= $3.750 billion. And that would not include the subsidies given for sales of other manufacturer’s electric vehicles in that time period. Suspending your view of the advisability of having subsidies for these cars in the first place, do you think that if sales are that robust, they should continue to be given subsidies? I don’t.
cbdakota
Electric Cars and Battery Systems are a Bust
Despite President Obama’s boast that HE was going to bring about the era of the electric car, it isn’t happening. Yes, he did what he could. He hoped that by not allowing the use of the most of our Federal lands, he could short the supply of crude oil and thus drive the price of gasoline up to a point where people would have to buy electric cars. It did not work because he could not stop the States and Private owners from developing their lands. It is now routine to see new supplies of natural gas and crude oil being brought on-line. He tried to do it by massive infusion of tax payer’s money into electric vehicle and battery production. But the cars being produced just aren‘t cutting it with the buying public. The prices are too high. Limited vehicle range coupled with long recharge times are not helping win them over either. A lot of the EV problems can be attributed to their batteries which are too big and heavy, cost too much and have questionable reliability.
Toyota sees the writing on the wall and has announced that it is getting out of the EV business for now. They will continue to produce and sell their popular Pris hybrid.
EV sales versus Obama’s goal
The President’s said that he wanted 1 million EVs and hybrids on the road by 2015. The Department of Energy released their analysis in 2011 that said 1 million was achievable. However, sales of the hybrid Volt are a little over 20,000 since introduction in late 2010. Sales of the EV Nissan Leaf are even smaller. See here ( https://cbdakota.wordpress.com/2012/09/11/president-obamas-pants-on-fire-acceptance-speech/)for additional discussion of 1 million cars goal from President Obama’s acceptance speech at the Democrat Convention. Analysts from all over are saying it is time to back off this goal.
Hysteria from the Environmentalists
The documentary “Who killed the Electric Car?” was winning awards for its”brilliant detective work” demonstrating how the”evil” corporations did the 1990ty’s EVs in. The awards were meted out by the same folks that still think the widely discredited “An Inconvenient Truth” is gospel. It is going to be much tougher to invent a story for this round of EVs and hybrids, when the truth is that the consumers really don’t want these vehicles. Sure, a small group wants them and they are the ones that go to the Sundance Film Festival. They can buy a $110,000 Tesla and can afford to not make practical choices for their transportation.
Let’s see now, GM has put up $1.2 billion developing the Volt. The Feds give a tax rebate of $7,500 to the buyer of a Volt—and they are talking about upping that figure. The dealers have been discounting the Volt to get them off their lots. This year the factory producing the Volt has twice stopped production when the unsold inventory reached 85 days. And depending on how one does the calculation, GM loses about $50,000 on each Volt sold according to Reuters.
A new factory is being built in Tennessee to manufacture Nissan Leafs. Nissan got a $1.5 billion low interest rate loan from the Feds for the construction. Nissan says the factory can produce 150,000 Leafs each year. Sales of the Leaf through August this year are 4,228. One has to wonder if Nissan Management isn’t concerned that they overbuilt this factory or perhaps even built it at all.
And the battery maker story is even worse, in my opinion. A123 got loans of $250 million from the Feds. A123 was facing bankruptcy when the Wanxiang Group, one of China’s biggest auto suppliers purchased 80% ownership in the company. Ener1 got $118 million in pledges from the Feds and another $80 million in State and local pledges. It was declaring bankruptcy when Boris Zingarevich, a Russian businessman with ties to former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, bought them out. A123 and Ener1 are suppliers to our military as well as to the EV and hybrid manufacturers. The battery technology developed (paid for by us taxpayers) is now in the hands of the Russians and the Chinese.
So, large amounts of money have been spent developing EVs and hybrids. GM and probably Nissan are losing substantial amounts of money every day as they continue to produce the Volt and the Leaf. The gasoline price is much higher than it was in the 90tys when that generation of EVs failed. It will be very hard to generate a believable story line for a new documentary on what” killed the electric car” this time unless they say the customers did not want them. Obviously that was the reason back in the 90tys, too.
Will there ever be a time for EVs? Probably. But it is not now.
cbdakota
President Obama’s Pants-On-Fire Acceptance Speech
The President’s acceptance speech at the Democrat Convention last Thursday was a pants-on-fire moment when it came to his
energy program. (There were other topics besides the energy program in that speech that also rated high on the pants-on-fire meter—but this is an energy blog.)
The President claims responsibility for the decline in the use of imported crude oil. “In the last year alone, we cut oil imports by 1 million barrels a day, more than any administration in recent history”. There are two primary reasons for this decline. First is because the manufacturing sector is still suffering from this less than robust economy—here his claim rings true as he is responsible for this economy. The second is that the States and Private property owners have managed to overcome his and his administration’s efforts to stymie the development of oil and natural gas fields. Yes, oil and gas production are up but not on Federal lands where the President has the “say so”. Oil production declined 11% and natural gas declined 6% on Federal lands from fiscal year (FY) 2010 to FY 2011. At the same time on State and Private Lands’ oil production increased by 14% and natural gas by 12% over that same period.
He said: “…. where we develop a hundred-year supply of natural gas that’s right beneath our feet. If you choose this path, we can cut our oil imports in half by 2020 and support more than 600,000 new jobs in natural gas alone”. While he is claiming credit for the natural gas, it really is No Thanks to Obama who has sent the EPA out to find reasons to rein in (i.e., reasons to stop fracking of shale) this State and Private land activity.
Oil and natural gas production from State and Private Lands will continue to increase and will be the driver of the US economic recovery. Not the “green” jobs that he has been promoting. “We have doubled our use of renewable energy, and thousands of Americans have jobs today building wind turbines and long-lasting batteries”. While Obama wants you think that wind and solar are soon to replace fossil fuels (oil, natural gas and coal) that is not happening. Fossil fuels supplied 78% and nukes another 11% of the US energy needs in 2010. Wind supplied about 2% and solar was barely above 0 %. That they are that much is a testimonial to the crony capitalism being practiced by the Federal government by subsidizing the capital cost of renewables installation. This practice leaves the rate payers holding the bag for the high cost of the electricity that renewables create. It looks like the US will be joining most of the rest of the world that have become disillusioned with wind and solar when Congress doesn’t renew the subsidies next year. Adding to their dismal performance is the fact that for every new Kw of wind and solar power, a corresponding amount of fossil fuel supplied energy must be built because wind and solar are too unreliable (the wind blows sometimes and not at others and we know the sun is not always shining) for the nation’s power grid to rely upon. So not only are these unreliable renewables not competitively priced, the global warmers don’t get a reduction in CO2 emissions.
“After 30 years of inaction, we raised fuel standards so that by the middle of the next decade, cars and trucks will go twice as far on a gallon of gas”. Despite the implication that he has accomplished something, this new standard is in effective 2025 and there are many reasons to question if it can be met. This will only be realized if significant numbers of electric vehicles replace gasoline based vehicles. And how is that program going? The hybrid Chevy Volt, the leading US manufactured vehicle, has sold through August about 13,170 making it unlikely they will meet the 2012 forecast of 45,000. The Volt is brought to you by Government General Motors (GM). Through August, the best-selling all-electric car, the Nissan Leaf, had sold 4,228 vehicles versus the 2012 forecast of 20,000. The electric vehicles are neither affordable nor efficient for the overwhelming majority of consumers who commute for work. The Volt’s selling price is about $45,000 before the Government tax incentive of $7,500. Even at that price, a recent report says: “Nearly two years after the introduction of the path-breaking plug-in hybrid, GM is still losing as much as $49,000 on each Volt it builds, according to estimates provided to Reuters by industry analysts and manufacturing experts.” A little perspective, the projected US 2012 sales of vehicles is about 14 million. There are something like 250 million registered vehicles in the US. Even if the Volt were to sell 45,ooo it is drop-in-the-bucket.
He says that man-made global warming is “not a hoax“. He is wrong. His EPA is writing regulations that will imposed a “cap and trade” program on the use of fossil fuels. Cap and Trade failed attempts at passage in Congress. Here he is usurping the legislative role of Congress.
The President’s energy program is a threat to all of us, and especially our children who are going to have to pay higher energy cost while having to cope with the massive debt this Administration has racked up.
cbdakota
Volt Sales UP But Little Likelihood Of Meeting Sales Forecast
GM reports that more than 2500 Volts were sold in August. They also announced that they would stop production of the Volt for a month. Volt production capacity is way in excess of current sales. This is the second stoppage of Volt production this year. Total Volt sales through August appear to be about 13,170 which are well short of the 2012 forecast of 45,000 hybrids.
Nissan’s Leaf sales in August were 685 EVs versus 395 last month. Through August, sales have amounted to 4228 vehicles. With four months left to go in the year, the auto media reporters are beginning to question Nissan’s many statements that they will sell more than 20,000 this year. A penetrating insight by these reporters –Snark.
I guess it is late reporting of sales or losses thereof, but it is hard to make an exact accounting of the monthly sales figures. The numbers change a lot. The auto industry accountants must have attended the same University as did the ones who issue the weekly national employment/unemployment figures. Each week the old forecast is amended.
cbdakota
